AI generated content is becoming a norm now with the progress made in the area of Artificial Intelligence. As the usage of AI generated content is increasing, we need to assess the outcome. Can the AI Content assure high quality or can it be as per the expectations.
Quality of AI-generated content
Our assessment is that the AI-generated content is much worse in quality in terms of its mechanical nature of writing. You may often find the phrases to be very repetitive. As AI content is based on specific formulas, it is bound to follow a mechanical structure. It’s very easy for a good reader to find machine or AI-generated content after reading just a few lines.
Most of the time, the tone is predictable, and the language is repetitive. At most, AI-generated content can provide data, which has to be manipulated by a real human who can classify it for human use and make it relevant.
AI-generated content especially fails when dealing with human emotions or a particular culture. The outcome can be really bad at times.
This is why AI-generated content should be avoided unless you have to use it to save on costs, because your work deals with mere data, or because the content needs to be superficial.
The best thing to do is to use AI content curation services offered by certain high-quality content companies, such as Content Connects, based in the Delhi-NCR region of India. With a high-quality team, it provides high-quality AI content extractions and AI content editing services.
Why human editors are required to assess the AI-generated content
Artificial intelligence is undoubtedly a powerful tool, but it cannot match the human mind and imagination. Human interaction with AI tools makes AI more relevant to human usage.
Developer prejudices: another important aspect is developer prejudices, which may result in biased results. Algorithms may accept various types of biases, including race, gender, nationality, etc.; therefore, human intervention is vital for its usage.
AI, in most cases, cannot understand the nuanced understanding in terms of the context of text. It does not have the emotional intelligence that a human possesses. Human creativity and editorial oversight are something that AI-written text can’t replace. Human intervention has the potential to offer uniqueness to the content as well as a unique perspective, which AI tools cannot offer.
Quality assurance through human intervention: Quality assurance through human intervention is necessary. Final usage if an AI-generated piece requires human authenticity. AI generated content has poor confidence among the users therefore human editors are required to work on AI generated content.